Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Chapter 11

Superior philosophy behind (for example) marketing

and pedagogy in 1970s and 1980s

 

I can not report about the superior reference-framework, thoughts and philosophies or psychologies behind the Danish educational system. I know too little about that[1].

May 19th 1996 a short feature in DR TV Avisen (the News from the Danish TV-channel DR) told that (Flexners) amphetamines had been taken into use against Danish children and young people that do not fit into the systems in our country. It was not presented in precisely this way.

May 26th 1996 the Danish TV 2 brought a transmission from a school class in Denmark, in which one half of the pupils had to consult the school psychologist.

 

I have taught as I found was right, as the students wanted, and according to the responsibilities I knew or felt I had in relation to the claims of examination, and also to transform some experience to the young people. The priorities were in reality mine. A lot of courses were supplied.   

 

I imagined that marketing- or concern-directors in Denmark and in Europe of the last 1900s did not have much in common with socialism-conscious pedagogues uniformed in lilac nappy as headgear in Denmark in the 1970s.

 

This imagination was a delusion.

Until the mid 1980s a book titled 'Marketing', and subtitled 'A scientific-theoretical analysis, A huma-nistic alternative' was included in the compulsory curriculum of the education HD, Marketing (the highest specialized education of business economy, the Danish correspondance to Master of Busi-ness Administration at the Commercial Colleges in Denmark).

The authors were Stig Ingebrichtsen and Michael Pettersson, the publisher Samfundslitteratur, Co-penhagen 1979. The illustration of the book-cover has been made from a copperplate founded on the Raphael's "The school in Athena".

This reading tries pretty coherent, but at the beginning a little hesitating, to state for different frames of reference, and to make a debate about an expanded paradigm - as it is called - to the learning of marketing in Denmark.

It explains shortly or refers to different philosophical views, and the frames generally, and specifically the frames of marketing.

The authors explain their paradigm or superior view on the pages 23 and 24. This is quite all right. Then we should know where we are. This view is something about "fundamental understanding of the world and the peoples or a real meta-language". All in all they start with J. Bärmark's method of an analysis of the works of Abraham Maslow, compare J. Bärmark's 'Wärldbild och vetenskabsideal. Naagra ledande temata hos Abraham Maslow', Göteborg 1976 (rap. No. 84). They use the frame-work of Bärmark to analyze Maslow and his works, they choose to use his method. That is fine.

The central model of Maslow to describe 'needs' illustrates with a pyramid physiological needs (as food, warmth and housing), at the next level safety- and social welfare-needs are placed, at the level above you find recognition- and prestigeneeds, and at the highest level in the pyramid the self-expression-needs. I wondered a few year why my students already tried to express "need" theoretically.

The model is without central importance in this connection, but in order not to create confusion just the mentioned.

The authors also try to describe their own "external and internal" ethics in relation to, what they ha-ve written in the reading. Ethics is not the right word. Responsibility in relation to their colleagues, and in relation to their "world-project" is more precisely. Here I noticed one thing included in the reading, I suppose about the "external ethic": "The responsibility consists in that what we produce here contribute to that ideal of a society (mine: internationalism), and the corresponding grounding view of human being. We have noticed the problems that may emerge in relation to the ideal of so-ciety on behalf of the global satisfaction of needs and our responsibility in this connection".

 

I do not hope the authors have sleeping-problems.

They mention that a few of their references concerns some writings that they have not quite under-stood themselves. After this I was just calm.

 

Now you have to understand that such a reading has been coded or characterized by what they ha-ve been coded with themselves. In this way they try the hide, what they have in view, and in this way nothing are very clear to unauthorized. If you eat it and ask to many so-called ‘stupid questions’ you might become authoirised yourself, but have to bring unrequested sacrifices first, so we know ‘you are safe’.  

 

We get in more than one way a review of Hegel, Wundt, Dewey, Thorndike and several other epigones of which Lewin (Gestalt-theory), Wertheimer (field-theory) and Goldstein (Holistic neurophysiology) in the experiments to manage the marketing-function optimally from above in private businesses, non-profit-organizations, state-organizations, political parties, medians.

Here they try with help from Bärmark to place Abraham Maslow, eventually to get his pyramid laid down on the side, as they outline in an illustration, and to get the topical (1979) marketing-paradigm moved or widened after their need in this connection to get a more existentialistic way of thinking included too.

Existentialism is very short connected to at group of philosophers, most speculative (or speculators if you wish), who maintain that "the existence comes before the essence" (before the thinking).

In relation to marketing: When the real existence is the continuos choice of the individual itself under a total-interpretation, the needs for anything must be interpreted as partly coordinated, and not as Maslow maintains - the authors maintain - in a hierarchy, and built up illustrated by a pyramid.

 

The world-famous Danish Soeren Kierkegaard is mentioned in a sentence by the way among these leading existentialists, overall leading among the leaders[2], I have to mention, perhaps as a matter of form that Kierkegaard points out the paradox:

"Life is lived forwards, but it is only understood backwards, and there has to be chosen under risk. Only if you are so cautious that you construct a system with the ethics in, you manage, because you then get a system, where you have everything, everything else, and have left out the only needfully", Soeren Kierkegaard wrote in the "Phases On The Way Of Life".

 

Especially Jean-Paul Sartre has had the interest of the marketing-authors in relation to the mentioned Abraham Maslow.

Page 77: "We support the focusing on Maslow, on the individually, on the characteristics and the individuality of the human nature, although we much more than Maslow want to take the develop-ment of the personality in an interplay with the factors of the outside world, that means institutions, structures of the society ans. The one thing is not created as a function of the other. The develop-ment takes place as a process of reciprocal action. But we agree with Maslow in that view of human being can find its philosophical basis by the existentialists, but in such a way that the inner of the hu-man being (its self) can not be recreated entirely, and all the time through the choice of the person himself".

The authors wrote.

Abraham Maslow: "On the way to a psychology of existence", Copenhagen 1976 (in the original from 1962): "There are existential psychologists that accentuate the self-creation of the self too one-sided"..."This is naturally in its extreme form an exaggeration, that is in direct inconsistency with the theory of heredity and the constitutional facts (mine: the ruling) of the psychology. In reality it is just foolish". "This extreme point of view is known to us primary through Sartre (for example in: J.-P. Sartre's: "Existentialism is humanism", Copenhagen 1968, original 1946).[3]

"Maslow's focusing on the interior human being must be seen as a reaction to the clear emphasis of the meaning of the environment of the behaviorists"[4].

"Maslow has - following the authors - chosen to believe on the natural goodness or neutrality, which for Maslow means that the self-actualizing people ought to rule the country", the authors then write at the beginning of page 77. Do not let us wander off into a lot of nonsense.

You see, Maslow belongs to the so-called "Third Power", after the existing till now, and the pure marxistic alternative. The "Third Power", trend or wave, they work in metaphors especially for the mystery and also to tranmit the signal the specific useful receiver of the message.

This is the Internationalism.

 

 

According to the pyramid of Maslow the Russian Alexander Solsjenitsyn tells in 'The Gulag Archipelago' that a substantial, edifying conversation or a tracking down, where you make notes all the time, can take place in one of the small, French train compartments with room for six persons - used in the Soviet Union - when twenty people had been squeezed into it. Even if your feet can not reach the floor, and you have not got anything to eat for several days.

 

The useless eaters cretainly have some qualification.

But this was then, but it can not be a lie. KGB was offered all the income from the sale of the book the Western World, if KBG managed to fin just one error of the facts in the book. They have not found any, as far as I know.

 

Well, we can very well lay down the pyramid, if the useful gentlemen and the ladies in the sectors of marketing in the so-called free Western World want so.

On page 105 the authors of “Marketing” write:

"Out of the potential alternatives it has been our intention to emphasize the existentialism as one alternative psychological movement to the "the behaviorism", with the believe on that inspiration can be brought from the existentialism to create an alternative understanding of the human being in the marketing-theory and theory of behavior. One of the authors is working with this problem (Pettersson)" (unquote).

 

The big jump in the economic theories of society happened at the transition from the phase, where you can or can not explain and foresee the behavior of the human being to the managed influence on behavior. The corresponding model of the explanation and forecasting of the human being suites the underlying so-called empirism later on positivism, the model-apparatus of which uses the model of causal-interpretation that needs the past to explain the presence and the future. The experience, the past and also the cause are not acknowledged, and this is perhaps quite legitimately to maintain, when models show themselves not to apply to the outside world, even if you have made an effort with all possible interpretations, especially those in symbols of mathematical language, and even control with e.g. econometric models proving the model is still a model.

And it is of special interest, when we for a moment concentrate our thinking a little on just another circle of subjects - which has not been discussed anywhere else:

 

Environment, ecology, stratosphere, menaces to the globe, effects on heath, influence of individual behavior in this connection, and the correlation including the influence of businesses on the surroundings, and not at least the commissioner's influence on behavior of the producer. Taken in a random order, which is the custom in this subjects.

 

In the treatment of these subjects it is fully correct and useful to show "coherence including causality" between this and that. This is often done by using the so-called statistical, quantitative methods.

I have a few hopefully correct comments to more of these statistical methods on: http://www.lilliput-information.com/stati/index.html.

 

They use phenomenons that can be described using numbers. I can assure the reader that two of the used methods, Regression and the Chi-test among others (try the mentioned link) have been used many times to obtain the wanted coherence or the wanted causality from the model[5].

The methods are very fine mathematics, but when you use them, it is very easy to 1. Interpret the problem wrong, 2. To choose a nonsense-coherence or, 3. To select the wrong method, 4. To use the methods wrong, 5. Interpret the results from the model wrong, 6. To make a wrong conclusion on the basis of the results of model, and transmit these results directly to be results of the real world.

Finally you can give the material to an unsuspecting, but "very understanding" journalist at a power-ful medium. As you perhaps might understand, there are several possibilities and especially a lot of impossibilities. One of these is (read 1. above):

 

Because two phenomenons appear at the same time, there does not have to light a clear and imperative coherence between them. If for example the number of couples of storks in Denmark in the summertime has increased from 12 to 25 couples in the last two years, this is not a sure indicator of a so-called boom of babies among the Danes.[6] 

 

On these stratetic subjects, the fear for the unknown, for the distant, for the unchallenged till now, for the unexamined, where refined methods of measuring often effect the observation, very much much can be shown and very much can not be refused - on the other hand to prove is something quite different. There are plenty of current phenomenons, plenty to undertake[7]. And then the career, not at least.

It is interesting that the cause can be used very easy here, even though equivalence, unambiguity, func-tionality, really are serious scientific problems, which often are overlooked, even though these pro-blems are rather determining all together.

 

You have to understand: The end justifies the means - especially for many ambiguities ones among the 'The Jesuits of the Time' for the salvation of the world. This was just a little disgression, but not without importance. A total statement on this theme ought to have a reading of its own.

 

If the fourth power or wave (after or at the same time as the third power) should not be found exactly around these new so-called "scientific-like causal-shows" I should wonder a great deal. The witch-craft at least can contribute to, what David Icke call the "Some-thing-Have-To-Be-Done-Effect",

that precisely matches Hegel's Tese-Antitese-Syntese (planning-)model.

If want to know about Hegels’ and other’s thinking click on: http://www.lilliput-information.com/deja.html

 

This happens at the same time that essential facts are totally overlooked - the cause can be used, when needed, “you know”.

 

An example from Denmark is The Water Environment Plan. Price dkr. 17 Mia. Several facts were completely overlooked in spite of the fact that you could have learnt in Holland, and you could have learnt a little more inorganic chemistry too. This was shown in Jyllands-Posten by our famous patriot from World War II Flemming Juncker.

 

From causal-models the transition first went towards the philosophical society-thinkers. They de-scribe, interpret and seek understanding. With this starting point causal-models are getting insuffi-cient, because the personality can not objectively be analyzed[8].

'Marketing' deals with much more that is not very central to this reading, the authors also find the market structure monopoly very convenient, if the concerned businesses accordingly work within an interna-tional objective. This mean centralism is prefered.

The theory of behavior is powerful, generally also in the Danish HD-education, and first-rate men lead the arrangement, the lectures, the problems, the seminars and the examinations. One of these, Professor Flemming Hansen wrote publicly November 21st 1989 and November 6th 1992 that 15 millions ought to live in Denmark. Of these 15 millions - we have near 5,3 millions inhabitants for the moment on our 43.850 square-kilometers - only half of them need to be individuals which have been born in Denmark, he wrote.

The first big transition is to experimental-psychology and WilhelmWundt. Wundt was not the end. We have to look at Sartre's view on the human being, as proposed by the authors of 'Marketing'.

Let us see, if that's the point, judge yourself:

 

"The anti-racistic racism is not new. It is connected to the intellectual clime of the 1960s and its leading figures, especially Jean-Paul Sartre. With Sartre's foreword to Frantz Farnon's book ('The damned here on Earth')[9], 1961, "the antiracistic" ideology has been created. Without the background in Sartre, "antiracism" of today can not be understood in its specific mechanisms and interior identi-fications. From Sartre there are a straight line to "SOS-Racism with Bernard-Henry Lévy as an inter-mediate", Monica Papazu wrote in the Danish period Tidehverv No. 8 68th volume, October 1994.

Monica Papazu continued: "When Sartre in the foreword to Franz Farnon's book expresses his "antiracistic" opinion, he happens to show, how the "anti-racism"  turn out to be opposite racism, how it take over the contents of the racism. The starting point and the intellectual reasons of Sartre are here "the fight against the racism", i.e. against "the racism of the whites". But instead of being pointed against the racism of the white race, the fight is pointed against the white race.

What Sartre is representing as contrast to the racism is simply another racism that in every respect imitates the first one. Contempt corresponds to comtempt, colonization corresponds to colonizati-on, violence corresponds to violence, manslaughter to manslaughter:"

"Yesterday you were, Europeans, the masters over the zombies, but "everybody have their turn (...) (today) you are the ones that are zombies"(p. 13)"...First there only is the violence of the colonialist, but soon their own (the Non-European), that is: the same violence is being thrown back on us, like our reflected image is meeting us, when we walk towards a mirror"(p.16)." ...Earlier we were the creators, and now other create history with us as the substance"(p. 24)"...It is our turn, step by step, to set foot on the way that leads to the 'native' level. But to become natives, our earth have to be oc-cupied by former colonized" (p. 25)"...We were human beings on his expence, he (the Non-Europe-an) makes himself a human being on our expense. Another human being: of higher quality" (p. 21).

In the reflected image everything return, even the hierarchy of the races will rise again in reverse or-der, with the European as the inferior race, and The Non-European as a superior race: a human be-ing "of higher quality".

"It is the hate of the races Sartre through a general damnation of the whites (all whites are guilty) explicit urge to. The European colour of the skin ("this fat, pale continent" - p. 22) can not be regarded without hate, when you follow his text".

The sense impression inspires an irresistible hate that only can find its release in the manslaughter: "to shoot an European is to kill two birds with one stone" (...)": one dead man and one free man are left" (p. 20). This is Sartre's internationalism.

 

"After many years The Language-Reform-Project in France succeeded in 1990. For several decades there has been made progresses to reform the way of spelling (1961-1965, 1976/1977), experiments that has failed  - the French did not alter their way of spelling in according to the official instructions, compare among others Journal Officiel, a report about the way of spelling at The Highest Tribunal Of Language directly under The Premier Minister of France".

"The language is not a meaningless element in the people's life. It is the people’s life. The question about the language is a question about the nation, and its spirit, it is a question about the tradition, and the keeping of the tradition, it is also a question about the new generations, culture and education, the school, it is a question about the relation between nation and the immigrants, and it finally is a question about the character and the borderlines of the political area" (unquote).

Monica Papazu wrote so in her pioneering essay about a new ideology of totalitarian kind that is ruling in Western Europe today: "Anti-Racism". Under a humanitarian facade the contents of the two main ideologies in modern times is reformulated in a peculiar mixing: racism and communism. The essay investigates its sources, basic themes, it forms of organization, and its relations to the institutions of the community. The title of the essay: The West-European taboo: The National"[10].

 

EU- and UN-pedagogy in the year 1996:

You can read how the development has been continued in a French book with the title: "Machiavel Pedagoque" ou le ministere de la réforme psycologique", by Pascal Bernardin, Edition Notre-Dame des Graces, Paris 1996. French-readers can buy the book in the book-shop:

La Joyeuse Garde - 5, rue Fondary - 75015 Paris - France.

That there is no chance that this book will be translated to Danish, and be published by an establi-shed Danish publisher should follow from:

 

Bitten Kirsti Nielsen, a former translater in EEC, EU wrote this review:

Mind Control and brainwash in the European schools. Is the school-systems becoming a new watch-factor for the European citizens?

Pascal Bernardin's book that deals with those reforms of education that are making their entry in the schools of EU-nations for instance are written on the basis of a considerable material of official documents, among those reports from special departments under (UN's) UNESCO and the Euro-pean Counsel, which object it is to make scientific readings of programs for actions of promotion of the "New World Order", and to export psychological technics of manipulation to the UN-members of countries.

The book deals with a quite new shape of education including cunning psychological methods of persuasion that have the purpose to change the pupils’ worth-norms and the behavior. This hap-pens through role-playing or arranged group-pressure on the single pupil (still through play). Such a working up of the unconsciousness of the pupils that it is, and where unwanted scepticism is analyzed and removed, is called practice of communication (in the language of codes), and it wea-kens the ability to develop the independent attitude of the child relatively quickly, and it gets the child to react obedient on certain stimulus of propaganda. But there is more.

If we shall believe Bernardin, the result of these kind of education is registered for every child in France on an EDP-Central for whole France as a link in the mind control of the citizens that is undertaken.

These technics of manipulation that especially have been tested in USA, have proven very effec-tively, as they can totally change the behavior of children, and get them to react in diametrical con-trast to what would be naturally for their religious, moral and political opinion.

There is in this abasement of the individual, an introduction of quite new criteria of good and evil, right and wrong that represents itself as being scientific (mine: even scientific like physics and mathe-matics, as we saw by Wundt and his epigones), and after which the child impart to a new internatio-nal, multicultural identity in the new society of the world, where the collective comes before the indi-vidual. The new worths (of UNESCO, EU and others) shall be promoted, but this is not the only thing. The morals and the worths that were leading the former generations, and that the parents naturally will try to pass on to their children must be blocked, Bernardin writes, and refers to the reports of the European Counsel. This breach with the old understanding of right and wrong - the understanding of the parents is exposed to the child, and it is explained away - naturally have to create an transition with moral and social chaos, but from this there will emerge a new order again (as it is quoted in the book from an UNESCO-report) controlled by the state and the international organizations.

The book also describes the teaching, that the teachers receive on specially established colleges of teachers in France "Institute universitaire de formation des maître", which selects teachers that are fit, and teaches them in the new norms of worth and psychological technics of manipulation.

This comprehensive adaptation of the mind in the schools has crowded out the literary subjects, but also in their area there has been a changing of the teaching methods and the material of teaching. The teaching must no longer be marked by national attitudes, but it has to follow the UN's standard instructions. This has as you probably know effected the teaching in history that now as a random representation of sporadic events in world history must encourage the cosmopolitan spirit. History must even be rewritten, so that the roots to the past is being cut, and there must be taught in the understanding of internationalism,  disarmament, and human rights (my comment: The World's holy human rights in contrast to the civil rights of freedom that also are called human rights, when they have been written in a good constitution (more below)), as undisputed elements in the new community-supporting ideology. And they also work for a new language.

As mentioned is the objective representation of the education substance far from enough in the new education-reform, thought out by UNESCO and others, because knowledge is not deciding any more.

The exposures of the book are frightening, and it is obvious to ask questions, if it really is acciden-tally, when young people today leave school without the ability to read and write,[11] or it is the result of the effort to adjust them in the so-called the 'New World Order'.

I wrote in 1991 the following explanations especially to the development of criminality. Now I hope the reader understand that all of us might be wiser by opening our eyes and ears, and direct our still unspoiled senses not just towards the symptoms, but directly against the roots of the evil, and look at the whole root-net in time and space.

 

 

Pieces of explanation to the explosion of criminality

1960-1990 and Trotsky’s Plan

The lawlessness is ruling well helped by the highest rulers of the country. Rulers of clear or ill-concealed totalitarian origin. First softness and pedagoque-whimpering. "If children and young people have inhibitions (like upbringing), they can not live a good life". There were a few others that maintained that they could not live without. These were not listened to, everything was new and smart. Then it was carelessness with other people and their property. Everything was tolerated in "the finer circles". It was just an expression of consciousness and emancipation, and "the fine ones" always stayed in an appropriate distance. These mental states were always filled up with rump-heavy fragments of theory and manners of speaking about the coming community of fortune, where every-body could do, as he likes. Everything has to be tried, and everything is allowed.

The whole indoctrination and false emancipation led to multitudes of human catastrophes, and broken lots among the criminals and among their victims. Naturally this resulted in more jobs of so-called treatment in an so-called (anti-)social sector[12], where primary and almost the entrie activity was that of 'half-studied robber knights and robber Dames' to judge from 10 feet shelves of law of social welfare. A law which transferred all judges of right to the worst rebels in the country. The problem was simply to find an article in Bistandsloven (the so-called law of social care in Denmark) that is not a law but a statutory instrument. The surfaces of programs, and the tone in the strongest media were brought in perfect harmony with the so-called critical (it means: Marxistic, later on Internationalistic) method of rousing.

 

The guilt was moved to the surroundings

This, the tone of the time spread the easy into most of our juridical system and to the highest in the Criminal Care. 

 

Now the same or corresponding 'investigation-makers' in among others the university-circles from the juridical, psychological, pedagogical, sociological and criminological coffee-clubs around Ole Espersen, Ole Krarup, Preben Vilhelm, Bernhard Baunsgaard, Erik Siegsgaard, and Tine Bryld plus many others (listed) told about the harm that the impri-soned had to suffer for breaches, which their familiar background, the community (it mean their neighbors) were guilty of following investigations made by practically ignorant desk generals. 

 

If you could note remove the children in time with compulsion to "constructive living conditions", they could end facing a judge, and at last it could lead to prison, sometimes after twentyseven with-drawings of charge, and a two feet long list of crimes. More paper, more cases.

A couple of years ago they have found out that the parents, who were told by the same or corresponding liars that the children should not be brought up, suddenly make mistakes. Now the parents have to take courses and be taken care of.

 

 

The prisons are being "disengaged":

In the 1980s the prisons of the Criminal Care in Denmark in average had about the same number of prisoners and employees, about 3,500 in each group, corresponding to a cost of dkr. 314,000 a pri-soner a year. When the criminality in the same period increased drastically, and the detentions and ordinary imprisonment for law-violations that were not violence, bodily harm, trade with narcotics, burglaries, occupied the room and the staff that could have been used for more heavily purposes, then the average utility of the capacity of the prisons for the gross criminals was the same in the 1980s, in spite of an very strong increase in the criminality.

Shorter imprisonments for the gross cases gave more free capacity in the prisons too, but more re-imprisonments, more paper and more criminality, as I showed above.

What prevented a greater harmony among the managing employees were always lacking resources i.e. always more personnel, as the condition for more freedom to the prisoners, more exits and more permissions, and more personal examinations follow automatically more suspended sentences, and more permissions again, more visits, more TV equipment, more entertainment, especially more secretaries of care, more evaluators, more course-producers and more social-pedagogues.

 

Dangerous norms and attitudes set a fashion

Criminologists and "leading learned ones in the law" (read: political correctly) have as mentioned used these - in their opinion - weak as tools not only to create that number of pseudo-explanations that was needed to create more and more jobs in the circles of their own in a community, where Bamse-Kylle for children, Voldborg weather-outlooks and Tommy Kenter (humor-)caricatures are symbols of the Dane with unlimited need for help.

More of the most influential ideologists and propagandists fill managing positions in radio and television today. 'the conscious Providence', not the chance, the experiences or their documented skills opened the passages to them.

That individual damages never have had any realistic value in Denmark as opposed to damages of objects for example in contrast to for example to USA, fits perfectly to the socialism-salvation-circles that have the ability to teach everybody anything to their own advantage any time.

 

It also deals with positions of investigation, treatment and media to the managing person-nel, and a ever increasing number of clients of deviationists, they can practice their tricks on, and eventually activate for their own objectives.

 

The same forces naturally salute a militant religion of rights - Muhamedanism – welcome in Den-mark in accompaniment of an massimmigration of tens of thousands of quite strange foreigners every year, and even though those (in 1996) strangers occupied 20-30 p.c. of the cells in our prisons. Of the appropriation to the Police Force of 1,347 mill. dkr. 503.7 mill. Kr. (37,4 p.c.) is reserved for the cost of living of asylum-applicants. Nearly all asylum-applicants, accepted asylum-applicants and immigrants charge the public social care in other ways too[13].

For this reason it is not surprising that the rulers salute the immigration welcome. It gives a infinite number of jobs of education, care, culture, and jobs in the media[14].

The immigrants from the totalitarian Middle East are prefered of course. ‘Socialism' still create effective slogans among the most primitive or militant, and the muhamedanes also make more excitement and unstability in Denmark than the 'socialism-experienced' Baltics, Germans and Russians.

The victims of the criminality generally are some of those that do not want totalitarian regimes to rule, and many of those still remember, how it went wrong, when Denmark was changed from a country, where the Danes mostly worked, thrived, and made it comfortable for each other.

 

If the reader may forgive that the rest of the 'Prison' was not appeared unambiguously in my consciousness 10 years ago, I can understand that my reading may shock those Danes, and other Europeans that in their obvious powerlessness unfortunately have let things happen until now.


 

Trotsky’s Plan

To get control in the World, and create A New World Order

(You can see the plan in British Museum, where it has been shown since 1906)

 

1970-1973 Professor Zbigniew Brzezinski's (Z. B.) book 'Between Two Ages' (1970) inspired to the establishment of The Trilateral Commission (1973). Prof. Brzezinski was one of the authors behind the report 'The Crisis Of Democracy'. Two of the authors of 'Democracy must work' were Z.B. and David Owen. In these books you can read the newer and more visible parts, internationally.

 

Here original Trotsky Plan:

1.

Destroy the young generation by treacherous and stupid making teaching.

2.

Remove the foundation of the family life.

3.

Get power over the public opinion by taking over the press and other media.

4.

Get power over the people by taking care of its vices.

5.

Undermine the respect for all religions especially Christianity.

6.

Destroy the art, the literature and the music.

7.

Encourage the desire for luxury, to fantastic fashion, foolish expenses, gradually reduce the ability to enjoy and be fond of healthy and simple things.

8.

Divert the attention of the masses from, what is really happening by all kind of entertainments and sport-competitions, - in short entertain the people to prevent them from collecting knowledge and to think.

9.

Poison the minds by negative theories and ideas, destroy the nerve system with constant noise and weaken the body by inoculation of different diseases.

10. "

Create general contempt and hate between different groups in the community.

11.

Pluck people for their old traditions, take possession of the language, replace honest business men with 'cold brains', which will be in front rank worshipping the golden calf.

12.

Take the vigor from the agriculture by indebting the farms and their ground and move the capital in the hands of the financiers, make industry to an object of speculation, and through speculation move the fortunes into the hands of the international high finance.

13.

Undermine the relation of confidence between employers and employees, infiltrate and get control of both the trade unions and large-scale industry.

14.

Encourage all possible misty utopia to lead people wild in a labyrinth of hopeless ideas.

15.

Exact the wages up, even though it will not give any advantage to neither the workers nor unemployed.

16.

Secure peculiar occurrences all the time that can weaken the international confidence, and take care of and utilize the enmity between nations, create hate, and work for larger and larger international armies.

17.

Throw well functioning democracies and place people on the most important positions, people that have some dark spots, they do not want to show, for example sexual-, speculation- or abuse-scandals.

18.

Gradually infiltrate and undermine every authority, so that we can be ready with our people.

19.

Organize huge monopolies in public, private or international domicile, in which all fortunes can be swal-lowed, when the political crisis is there.

20.

Prepare the death struggle of the nations, exhaust the peoples of the world by pain, lack and unrest and deprive them their possibility of existence.

 

Go to next chapter



[1] Here I will point at Henning Fonsmark's excellent book: 'The fight against knowledge...' (in Danish), published by Gyldendal, Copenhagen 1996. In this book Fonsmark mentions on the pages 40-41 that New Education Fellowship (N.E.F.), and the reform-pedagogues (from Denmark) met at an international meeting in Calais, France in 1921. Among other excellent books Henning Fonsmark wrote 'The History Of The Danish Utopia'(in Danish), Gyldendal, Copenhagen 1990.

[2] God knows why(!)

[3] You have to remember, what the authors want. The subject or the discussion in 'Marketing' must be softened to the reader in the end of the reading.

[4] Those who conquered the American education-system after they had followed the philosopher Hegel in Berlin or the experimental psycologist Wundt in Leipzig.

[5] Statistical method of analysis, behind the most 'so-called investigations', that is shown to the reader very often on TV as a resulting report, an examination or the like, are often clearly misuse. They all show just that something-must-be-done or problem-reaction-solution as pointed out by David Icke.

[6] "Babies are comming with the stork", small Danish children were told earlier. In the beginning of the 1990s the Danish authorities informed about a boom of Danish babies, although the Danish did not seem to give birth to more children. The number of babies beared by foreigners or their children could be 20,000-25,000 a year then - you could not control how many form the official accounts - out of a birth-number of totally about 70,000 a year. It should be mentioned in this connection that the Danish made - and still do - between 17,000 and 19,000 abortions a year in the beginning of the 1990s.

[7] Environment, illness, health and the contributions in these connections.

[8] This has been shown already by the philosopher Emanuel Kant.

[9] Notice when taking the Hegelian thinking into consideration that the “Damned here on Earth” might be the “Useless Eaters” or “the superflous ones”.

[10] Monica Papazu is a Rumanian living in Denmark.

[11] This is documented as far as Denmark concerns with zealous care in "The Fight Against Knowledge...", (in Danish) by Henning Fonsmark, Gyldendal, Copenhagen 1996.

[12] Where "A" stands either for Social Democtrats or very suitable for "Un" (in English), which in Danish is called A.

[13] As we saw above with totally dkr. 60-90 bill. a year (1996 and 1997). More than dkr. 100 bill. in 1998.

[14] Plus many good votes for socialism to a dieing Social Democratic Party.