Chapter 9
Mental condition develop
behavior
including criminal behavior
'The temporal apostles of
the repressive tolerance' taught by the totalitarians of temper in
Germany, France and USA made their entry.
Let us begin backwards:
The criminality and
police resources in Denmark with 5.2 mill. inhabitants in 1991 (4.6 mill in
1960), of which 1/3 lived in towns with more than 10,000 inhabitants.[1]
[2]
The
official accounts can not be continued meaningfully (after 1991), because trustworthy
descriptions of the criminality distributed on nationality have been lost in
Denmark.[3]
The number of notified
violations of the criminal law has more than doubled from 1960 to 1990, and in
the period 1980-1990 they increased by 35 p.c. to 550,000 notified violations
in average a year.
Earlier about 30 p.c. of
such violations were solved, in 1991 about one of five (20%) ended with a
solution.[4]
In 1960 the Police and Prosecution had 7,375 employees, in 1991 the number was
14,500, including 10,200 policemen
The
long arm of the law
In 1962 they had a
policeman on the Police Station in Svendborg[5].
The youngsters called him 'Lemmy' - a figure from an English very popular
detective movie. They connected this policeofficer a little with the figure
from the movie.
There was some points of
resemblance. Eric could confirm that, when he had to admit that he has smashed
some windows in the Railway Station of Svendborg in order to make an impression
on some young girls.
'Lemmy' did not let the
young first-time-violators run. He caught them, and took them to a not very
nice night in the detention. The only thing the youngster did not like by
'Lemmy' was that he always was present, when wrong things happened. Otherwise
they liked him. Eric found out that it costs to make troubles, and he should
not go farther on the road of the offenses and the criminal actions.
The development in the more
dangerous criminality
Intentional violence and
bodily harm occurred in a number of a few hundreds in 1960, from 1991 6,400 a
year were suspected. About every half year the number of such cases increases
with 50 p.c. Cases of narcotics were nearly unknown in 1960, in 1991 more than
1,700 cases were tried by police of criminality and by the Prosecution in one
year.
The most cases of
criminality is about larceny, larceny for the purpose of limited use and
house-breaking (totally 430,000). The number of larcenies and house-breaking
have increased nearly five times in the period 1960-1990.
The number of robberies
increased in the period from about 300 a year to nearly 10 times 300. Alone in
the 1980s the number of robberies more than doubled.
Cases
about fortune, money including taxes blocks for cases about assaults,
narcotics, bodily harm, larceny and housebreaking. 112,000 cases of violation
of the criminal law in 1989; there were 538,300 notified violations, 1,918
prosecution-withdrawns and 21,659 cases where prosecution was left undone.
The official explanation to
criminality
On the reasons behind and
the effects of the way things have been developing as described here, the elite
of power, criminologists, pedagogues, journalists, sociologists, psychologists,
evaluators and other can tell a great deal, and they have the possibility to do
this, when they want to.
It is always something
'about an investigation that shows..', the one more effected or unscientific
and design than the other[6]
In the Danish newspaper
Politiken 23rd July 1989 you could read a reporting from Institute of
Crimino-logy. Interior migration from rural to urban districts[7],
differences in the economies of people, and an asserted increased willingness
to report criminal acts are stated as reasons to the explosive development in
the accounted criminality. "In the beginning of the 1980s it was the
unemployment that should be guilty, in 1989 the unemployment effected in
contrary, it was so disciplining to young people that they instead concentrated
to live healthy and rationally", you could read in the same feature
article in Politiken. In 1990 you began to read in the newspapers, and see on
TV that large proportions of the violations of the criminal law were not
reported stated caused by reprisals from the criminals, who nearly every time
is led free after ended examination. They even tried to explain the development
by interior migration of Danes from the country-side to towns. Unfortunately
the share of the Danish population living in towns with 10,000 or more
inhabitants had not changed in the period as I introductory stated . What do we
do?
Yes,
you have to hear and see a lot before you loose your senses, especially your
sense of humor.
In 1960 people talked to
each other in the buses, and carrier cyclists whistled the tune of the day,
when they hurried through Copenhagen[8].
From 1975 it was the practice in schoolclasses that the children shouted and
screamed, while the teacher tried to find something, they felt like listen to.
From 1980 nursery schools rushed up into the buses, and overturned old people.
In 1988 less than 200 street-mischiefmakers could terrorize whole quarters of
Copenhagen, while a frightened crowd of policemen just looked at what was
happening, afraid of being the persecuted in the media that represents
upper-Denmark least by good most by evil.
In 1991 the forces of
'the Possesseds' and of 600 vicars were united to neglect the law and the
rights in Denmark. A church-occupation in Copenhagen. From that church they
made a new Special-Law via the media
for some of their friends from the Middle East. Our parliament had to accept,
perhaps because they are servants, not real rulers.
Who represents
the real power? The Government or International Red Cross. Or perhaps we have
to go higher. Many despaired individuals asked like this, when I traveled
around and told facts in the period 1990-1992.
In
2000 600,000-750,000 immigrants (11-14 p.c.) had settled in Denmark. They are
called refugees, even though they have paid their wage-income for three years
to come here on false papers. They occupy more than 30 p.c. of the worst cells
in the prisons, and they are prosecuted 3-5 times[9]
more than the Danes, when you compare to their population rate, and you look at
the gross and most infamous criminal acts following the official Danish
statistics[10].
In the description of the
criminality it is important to give the possibility of comparison in relation
to the foundation of the population, and to their charges for each head
category of criminal acts divided between Danish and foreigners by the Danish
Commissioner of Police. [11]
Without such
possibilities (from 1992) the accounts have no meaning anymore.
An example of the consequences of
the false arrangement
With the official
foundation of population the analysis of the Danish Commissioner of Police in
the years 1993 and 1994 lead among many other things to the following
conclusion:
4.5
p.c. of shop-larcenies in Denmark were done by Danish citizens. 11.4 p.c. were
done by foreign citizens, 84.1 p.c. of the larcenies were done by
asylum-applicants. Notice that last
percent. Notice that it was 84.1 p.c. of all
shop-larcenies in the country, if the charges have been made. Here I had to
trust the Commissioner of Police. This criminality was the logic consequence of
the official information, and this criminality should have be made by 10.3 p.c.
of all the asylum-applicants, as they are called in the analysis. And in
addition the 84.1 p.c. of all shop-larcenies were only 65.2 p.c. of all the
violations of these asylum-applicants.
This
is simply false. It is a wild exaggeration to maintain that asylum-applicants
are 18-19 times more criminal than the Danish citizens by this criminal act.
But this is the logic consequence of the official information.
Generally
it is difficult with lies. If there officially should be very few
asylum-applicants in the country, and charges have been made against them, then
they have to be very criminal. If on the other hand there were more
asylum-applicants in the country, the criminality are divided on this larger
number, and then they are less criminal.
[As a racist you would not have focused on these
aspect, I guess. The state did not.]
This critical analysis[12],
of which a single element was brought to light here, was mailed to Folketinget (the Danish parliament). There were no useful
reactions.
Now the reader perhaps
understand, why the accounts of the criminality were not published for three
years until 1993. One of two central the persons, (MPs) who prevented the
publication is a former Minister of Justice in Denmark.
In the beginning of my
analysis including explanations and comments I asked the authorities some
questions. These questions are listed in the following. The answers I received
were not useful, not as information, but they were very fine documentation.
Bureaucratic flight from the responsibility. I told the public this, and I tell
it here too. The answers of the authorities have not been translated to
English. The original answer in Danish has just been copied according to its
worth. It is included in the next section (hard copy).
Questions to the responsible authorities about the results of the present reading
[the present
reading: Investigation of criminality
1993 and 1994 made by the Commissioner of Police]:
1. In the period
1980-1994 58,048 have received the Danish citizenship by naturalizations. 72
p.c. or 41,783 concern immigrants from outside Western Europe and outside North
America. 1980-1999 the number is 97.435. Will the account of
criminality on this foundation be arranged in such a way that it can clearly be
seen, if the charges concern naturalized?
2. Question 1
actualizes even more of the fact that young women who are children of
naturalized, in these years begin to bear children who in spite of their
language, culture, and of the father officially can be indicated as Danish.
3. The number of
'asylum-seekers' is included in the investigation of the Commissioner of Police
for the years 1993 and 1994. The number in this category is indicated for the
two years to respectively about
21,000 and 20,442.
It has been shown in this
analysis that these figures can not include all refugees including those in
integration-programs in 1993 and 1994.
When there do not exist
official accounts of refugees referring to fixed dates of the year, I want to
be informed a little more precisely on which basis the number of refugees as a
part of the population in the statistic analysis has been selected? When the
accounts of the number in the analysis automatically lead to an systematic
overestimated criminality of the refugees, do the authorities then plan to
correct the accoun-ting-fault so that the account of the population of Denmark
will be in good order hence-forward?
4. Will an
initiative be taken to make one description for each category or head-category
of criminal acts - and not for a total number of different actions for a part
of the population?
5. When the
official period 'News from Criminal Care' in the numbers 5, 6 and 7 1994
informed that the proportion of the imprisoned foreigners in Danish prisons was
10-12 p.c., and interior sources in the prison administration informed that the
proportion in those of the prisons, where the strongest punished were
imprisoned, was 28-32 p.c., does this large divergence attribute to a large
diviation in the proportions in the single institutions? Or must this
divergence also be seen as a fault in accounting. The 28-32 p.c. matches
precisely our estimated frequencies in the more strong criminality among
foreigners?
6. If the
investigation of the criminality caused by faults in population-basis and/or in
the individual-category-choice does not fulfill the scientific claims about
adequance and unequivocability, will it be corrected then so that it shows a
correct picture of the criminality in Denmark including the proportions of
foreigners and of Danes in their country?[13]
The Minister of Justice, The Minister of Interior Affairs, their predecessors, and some of their civil servants in the Directory of Foreigners and the Department of Interior Affairs incur a serious responsibility for their misinformation by distorted descriptions of the criminality in Denmark for example in the years 1993 and 1994.
[1] Following the official statistics of criminality and ditto statistics/accounts of population.
[2] A small homogenous country and easy to see. Perhaps the reason why Denmark was selected as an experiment, a younger employee in Red Cross happened to tell on a course of management in the seventies.
[3] Shown in 'Analysis of the crimnality and population in Denmark for the years 1993 and 1994' that I made November 1995.
[4] I remember when the number decreased to less than 50% in Denmark, and I am 52 years old. In Berlin 44% of such violations were solved in 1996.
[5] A town in Southern Fune (the island in the middle of Denmark) with about 25,000 inhabitants in 1962.
[6] More detailed explanation under 'Danish Marketing' in chapter 10.
[7] On page 85 we saw that less than one third of the Danish population live (lived in 1960) in towns with more than 10,000 inhabitants.
[8] Now the most people I hear whistle do so, when they are nervous.
[9] Depending on what crime you choose.
[10] The official statistics of criminality has been damaged in Denmark now. I shall show this below.
[11] This is what the mentioned private analysis of criminality and population does. I have from other points of view shown that the statistics and the accounts of the population in Denmark have developed highly unreliable. The autorities have not shown any effective interest to bring it in good order, even though this would have been done very easy by looking at the Swedish system. The critic occupied many columns in the Danish newpapers from the end of the 1980s to the beginning of the 1990s.
[12]
The analysis
(in Danish) is shown in: http://www.lilliput-information.com/kraka.html
[13] A description
in the newspaper Jyllands Posten September 4th 1996 confirms my results. This
confirmation had not been necessary, but it is funny that the 30 p.c. of the
criminality is that of the foreigners, when the numbers are presented by the
police in Aarhus, and the population is described by the Town Counsel of
Aarhus. 30 p.c. of the criminality means that the immigrants in Aarhus are about 3-5 times more
criminal than the Danes according to their part of the population. Earlier I
had focused on the fact that the population-accounts in the town Aarhus are
better than average in Denmark. Now the results of the analysis clearly
confirms this.