Chapter 5
Federal
Reserve Notes are not dollars,
and EURO is not Krones
Back to the semi-official version of the way of the
world.
The trust in the dollar
had disappeared. But the blame must be taken. “Responsible money-makers”? Back
to the gold? In 1971 USA gave up to
redeem dollars with gold. There is, you see, only the confidence, and it can be
lost, when weak, power-greedy governments in their craving to survive
accelerate the amount of currency-notes, and give us inflation, unstability, mass
unemployment and national debt as the only final results in the long run. It
must be pointed out, and must not be forgotten that 25 years with the US$ as
the precondition of the victory of the allied, the reconstruction of friends
and also earlier enemies after World War II, and at the same time stable growth for a
longer period than the world has ever seen. It is not little. Confidence and
production was needed, when a lot was smashed up in Europe. But as you will
see, it was not the whole truth, not the truth alone and nothing but the truth.
Which war are we talking
about. The plans and the international monetary system before World War I, the plans made in World War II or plan of the
Euro-state. The planned stringency of speaking nonsense
is really admirable, and it is especially admirable that it has not been
unmasked until thirty years has gone. A little more than one generation[1].
I request the reader to
look carefully at an one dollar note. The one issued by Roosevelt in 1933.
Regard it carefully in the light of what I have told here (more about this
below).
Keynes and White (=Weiss)
died both of them in obscurity, and they were disappointed. Weiss was
interrogated for Communism-likes by Russel A. Nixon, a young, dependent
lawyer. White was a member of C.F.R.[2].
This lawyer was not the one who became President later on in USA, and the one
who appa-rently abolished the dollar, Richard Millhouse Nixon.
On
this background you may say that is quite a performance, especially if you take
into account that the plan from the beginning has been to put the dollar and
the gold out. That
everything in the scenario has been made topical from 1971 to 1999 must not
surprise. A new system has been planned, and besides the primary tasks are
running very well, national indebting, and the suppression of the nations
through wars to One-World-Dictatorship. In Europe they hope to continue with
one country instead of 15-16 perhaps many more selfdeciding nations.
D. Roosevelt/Henry Morgenthau-understanding of the gold that was (as may
understand) the understanding of
Keynes: Gold is a relic from a barbarian era, they wrote. The fact that the
dollar and the gold from the start of the Bretton Woods Agreement were connected via the constant price on gold in dollars
was fatally[3].
There had been cautioned against it. I am
apt to agree, but on a rather different basis, and with quite another argument.
The word barbarism is sounding very nasty, when it is coming from an organ of
the Messrs Keynes, especially Morgenthau and Roosevelt. If you read, what the
leading man, Lord John Maynard Keynes wrote about inflation just after the World
War I [4] [5],
you will see a real supplement to the barbarism-understanding (refered to
above):
"There
is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than
to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic
law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a
million is able to diagnose". (unquote).
You
grow older and perhaps you grow more placable too [6].
Some personal weaknesses might have given the needed
results in the case, Keynes.
You see, this was the new World Order of the past. It
is the newest World Order too.
Before and now the same.
This Order shall not be discussed in an even so-called democratic way.
President Bush Senior
introduced the expression “New World Order” under the Golfwar. We have been
searching a telephonenumber or an address to contact in order to learn more of
what in going on.
However EU is in the soup.
EU will rise or fall with compulsory exchange or a military union. None of
these arrangements are especially popular among the peoples of Europe. Only the
people in Scandinavia are asked through more or less binding referendums until
now, but not before people have been thorough manipulated by the media. Tony
Blair has also promised the Englishmen a referendum on this subject, but
promise was under cretain condition of which is able to manipulate himself, and
the voters doubt he will keep his promise if the Danes vote yes, they told us.
The Danes voted NO to Euro September 28th 2000.
If
EURO fails, the
development of the Western Union have to be speeded up, if the project shall
not fall.
The interference in
Ex-Yugoslavia was exactly an attempt to get a new military instrument tested in
spite of the unofficial conflicting foreign policy among the EU-nations. The
sanctions against Austria februar 2000 was a tast of the following Nice Treaty
to be decided already december 2000. EEC/EU should not make foreign policy at
all and especially not start wars.(?)
On issue
constitutional rights or the popularized so-called human rights we have
extracts from the Committee of European Paliament, read chapter 12:
Repite the words
of Fürst Metternich about 1820 (mentioned above).
The
Trilateral Commission (TC)
The international,
superior and half-secret agency that first will well-knit the world in three
non-democratic blocs so that it can be brought to a the conclusion with the
celebration of The New World Order after the blocs USA, EU and Asia has been
totally coordinated. TC consists of 300 powerful members from 14 countries in 3
departments. It was established in 1973 by the Council on Foreign Relations (read about C.F.R. above), in which the biggest financiers and
industrial magnates of the world are members. C.F.R. made R. M. Nixon, J.
Carter, G. Bush, B. Clinton, and most of the others since 1919 to presidents of
USA., and it admitted Z. Brzezinski as member (mentioned above, read more below).
TC had a secret meeting in Copenhagen April 23 th 1995 (read below: 'Private
Top Meeting'). Four of
the executing powers in TC are besides the founder David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger and Z. Brzezinski, who is a Herbert Lehman professor of political science at
Columbia University, and David Owen, who in 1984 was a member of the English
Parliament, and the leader of The Social Democratic Party, former Minister of
Foreign Affaires for Labour[7]. In the
1984-publication, 'Trilateral Commission Task Force Report, number 28, Democracy
must work' is written on page 72 in the conclusion:
"Short
of a benevolent world dictatorship bent on reform, we must work within the
bounds of an ineffective, adolescent international system, with all the pains,
crises and irrationality, which adolescence dictates".
You can read on page 84
the exact recipe for the economic- and labormarket-policy under crises, as we
continuously had it in Denmark from the mid eighties, and we still have it. You
can read what was/is done all over Europe regardless to the color of the
governments. From here changing Danish Ministers of Foreign Affairs and
Ministers of Economy also got/still get the philosophers' stone by frequent
consultations, for example on OECD-meetings and EU-weekend-consultations. I can
men-tion that former Chairman of The Commission of EEC/ EU - now a Bilderberger
- Jacques Delors is very fond of the Danish 'on leave –
camouflage' [8].
He invites it welcome in EU, compare EU-ROPE no. 9 1996 from The
Commission of EU.
According to an information sheet
supplied to the responsible of www.4rie.com
by the TC, dated March 23, 1994:
Zbigniew Brzezinski showed how
serious TC ambitions were in the July 1973 Foreign Affairs, stating that
‘without closer American-European-Japanese cooperation the major problems of
today cannot be effectively tackled, and ... the active promotion of such
trilateral cooperation must now become the central priority of US policy.’
(Emphasis in the ordinal.)
The best way to effect this would be for a Trilateralist to soon become
President. One did." (Jimmy Carter.)
... In 1973, Carter dined with
the CFR chairman (David Rockefeller) at the latter’s Tarrytown, New York
estate. Present was Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was helping Rockefeller screen
prospects for the Trilateral Commission. Brzezinski later told Peter Pringle of
the London Sunday Times that ‘we were impressed that Carter had opened up trade
offices for the state of Georgia in Brussels, and Tokyo. That seemed to fit
perfectly into the concept of the Trilateral.’ Carter became a founding member
of the (Trilateral) Commission - and his destiny became calculable.
They hold annual secret meetings
including only members, and very select guests.
The full Commission
gathers once each year: In Libon in 1992, in Washington in 1993, in Tokyo in
1994, in Copenhagen, Denmark 1995. In the end of this book we have some
extracts from an article refering the meeting in Copenhagen.
A
little useful piece of the newer history
Zbigniew Brzezinski[9]
(Z.B.) points out in his book from 1970, 'Between Two Ages' his and Robert Baily's
view on the changing of the European time-spirit:
"We shall from today
live through a phase of time with the following aspects, 1st There is no progress, 2nd
Social evolution is cyclical, 3rd Western civilization is in a period of
disintegration and decline, 4th Man
is non-rational or irrational, 5th
Society is composed of masses who, being nonrational and easily influenced,
shall reduce mankind to mediocrity, 6th
Scientific truth and knowledge may be harmful for society, 7th Myth and superstition
can be beneficial, 8th A society is composed always of conflicting,
9th The society is ruled by the
elite, 10th Democracy and
humanitarian social values are unfortunately misundertakes that results in the
rule of the uneducated masses. And he also adds that mankind has to live
through the following phases in the long historical perspective, the phase with
a religious clarification, the socialistic phase, then the era of the nations,
and in the end the One-World-Society
to crown the achievement".
Among
others a publication with such ambitions resulted in the establishment of The
Trilateral Commission. Z.B. was one of founders, and he was the director of
it for the first three years till 1976. He was a former security-adviser for
the Carter-administration . He has
just (2000) published a book in which he forsee that Europa and Russia are
going to be conquerored by the islamic world. What a nice thing. Bill Clinton
has assured too that his puritanic Christianity together with the American
Constitution fits perfectly to Islam. Puritanic is ‘a fine word’ especially in
this connection.
You
must understand that such books (mentioned above) is giving signals[10]
or perhaps the book makes prophesies[11],
so it is a little difficult the tell, if it is a plan, it is not clearly
described in the book. Perhaps it is an inevitable destiny for the people or
perhaps the process shall be created, simply be urged perhaps. You can not read
it very exactly in his published book.
But it is fundamental the
same melody that is sung all over in the ideological literature around UN with
the manifold agencies of bureaucracy. It was indeed also played among others by
authors like Bernard Shaw, Israel Cohen, Israel Zangwill and Jean-Paul
Sartre, of which the
three first mentioned established the
declared socialistic-masonry Fabian
Society. They were
ancestors to SOS Racisme in France with Bernard Henri Lévy as a connecting link. Listen to the
expressions from among others International
Socialists and the Autonomes in Denmark. Their
language is not at all the same, but the pyramid-management is actually rather
plain[12]
The Bilderberg Group
Established May 29th to
31st 1954 in Hotel Bilderberg in Holland formaly by Prince Bernhard of Holland,
but idea came from the Polish socialist Joseph Retinger, who had a high degree
in the Swedish masonry. The objective is control of the world-economy. In the
Bilderberggroup that is the secret
world-government, is some of richest men and women of the world, included
princes and princesses, top-leaders of the finance, the head-figures of
politicians, of the industry, of the media and the press and other influential
persons. Also Robert Schumann, Jean Monnet (the
originators tors of EU) were members. Today Jacques Delors (former
Chairman of the EU-Commission) is participant too.
The
media do not mention The Bilderbergers, and the work of the group[13].
The objective is common economy for Europe and USA, free migration, free
circulation and commodities (as free as possible with megamonopolies on all
important areas), international police, international brigadearmy beginning
with 100,000 men in 1996, and a World-Parliament.
I have to admit that the
Bilderberg Group was not mentioned in the Danish media from 1966 to 18th
of Mars 2000:
Showdown with secret power groups
By Jens Kerte
The Net version Saturday Mars 18th 2000
The Danish Newspaper Politiken: http://www.politiken.dk/VisArtikel.iasp?PageID=106080
Politiken Sunday:
Danish ministers and top
civil servants must have a prohibition against participating in secret
ma-sonic-like meeting, the Party List of Unity means. The Party List of Unity
has proposed a bill of decision in the Danish Parlament. (quote) "In such
secret meetings - as the meting of the Bilder-berg Group - the power brokers
coordinate their views and cover up for each other", Frank Aaen from the
Party List Of Unity means, and says :
"when it takes place in deepest secrecy it is a scandal that ministers at
high level has participated with-out any democratic insight".(unquote)
More members of the EURO-Parlament and Folketinget (The Danish Parlament)
insist on that the participation of Danish ministers and European Commissioners
in high political discussions in the yearly, closed conferences of the private,
so-called Bilderberg Group beeing brought to light.
Ritt and Uffe
For the last few years
both the former Minister of Foreign Affairs of (the Party) Liberal Left Uffe
Ellemann-Jensen and the former EU-Commissioner Ritt Bjerregaard (the
Social-democratic Par-ty) have participated in these two-days conferences,
where the participants are instructed confi-dentiality. Prime Minister Poul
Nyrup Rasmussen (the Socialdemocratic Party) gives an answer to one of the
written questions on this matter, .that there have never been any decision of
the go-vernment about Bilderberg.
On this background among other things the Prime Minister says that he does not
see any (quote) "basis to criticise, if Danish ministers have participated
in the so-called Bilderberg Meetings." (unquote)
Several invited to the Bilderberg
Meetings
Uffe Ellemann-Jensen has since 1984 been present at the confidential
discussions of Bilderberg eight times the information of Politiken shows, while
Ritt Bjerregaard participated as newly fled-ged EU-Commissioner Of Environment
in 1995. All in all a dozen of Danish ministers have par-ticipated since the
first meeting in 1954.
Neither Uffe Ellemann-Jensen nor Ritt Bjerregaard briefed the Tribunal Of
Foreign Affairs or their Parlamentary Chiefs about their participation.
Unformal discussions
Their comments to
Politiken is the following: (quote) "There was no need caused by the
simple reason that there was no talk of that Denmark in any way was getting
bound of the unformal debate", (unquote) says Uffe Ellemann-Jensen.
"I have not briefed anybody about my participation, because Bilderberg is
a Think Tank that cannot make any decisions at all. There is no basis of being
concerned about that people meet and talk to each other" (unquote), says
Ritt Bjerregaard.
Seven of the present 20 EU-Commissioners have during the last few years been
connected to Bil-derberg, and in the EURO-Parlament The Greens have been
working for, that these relations now is broad to the public knowledge. The
commisioners in question continuing deny to tell, what they have been
discussing on the Bilderberg meetings.
The Bilderberg Meeting started in 1954 as a forum for secret political
discussions between top-folks within Politics, Finances and Industry from the
NATO-members. Original the idea on the private conferencesto discuss strategies
against the international socialism. Among the origina-tors to the Bilderberg
Group was Prince Bernard of Holland. POLITIKEN
(unquote)
This
article posted at: http://www.bilderberg.org/2000.htm
The most Bilderbergers
are also members of C.F.R. David Rockefeller is a
General Secretary in the inner-most circle. Danish politicians, a few in top of
the industry and a few high placed media-people also figures on the lists of
members and meeting participants.
You can read more in The
Review of New York the 21st of January 1972 and in the American weekly
newspaper The Spotlight.
The
leading figure behind EU, one of its founders, Jean Monnet, was employed by the new Bank of America just
like Elisha Walker, when Amadeo Gianinni, original owner of Bank
Italy in California, with the new Bank-Law in the thirties should throw his
bank into the fight with the dominating Wall-Street-banks as a speculative and
investing bank.
Walker and Monnet tried
by their disposals to displace A. Gianinni in 1930, when he officially was on
holyday in Austria. They did not succeed, Gianinni returned, and with help from
other shareholders he took his power in the Bank of Italy back again. He fired
Monnet and Walker in 1932. Gianinni remained the leader of the bank for
thirteen years thereafter[14].
The international establishment on the top of undemocratic managed UN, International
Red Cross, IMF (International
Monetary Foundation), The World Bank, the EU Commission and
masonic-like C.F.R, the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, the Round Table, the Royal Institute of International Affairs,
Club300 a.o. agencies have for a long time (in principle since May 1st. 1776) had a plan about a World Government.
"In
the modern Europe is no room for homogeneous national states. It was an idea
from 1800s, and we are going to carry it (multiculturalism) through in 2000s,
and we are going to create multietnic states." General in NATO Wesley
Clark, June 1999 on CNN.
In 1977 the
British newspaper The Times described the Bilderberg Meeting with the words:
"...a clique of the richest, the economical and political most powerful
and influential figures in the West meeting secretely to plan events that later
on just happens by chance". In Financial Times the column writer Lombard
noticed: "If the Bilderberg Group is not a conspiration of some kind, it
acts as a exceptional good imitation of one".
"The
one who cannot see that on Earth a big endeavour is taking place, an important
plan, on which realization we are allowed to collaborate as faithful servants,
certainly has to be blind" - Winston Churchill - (33 Degree Freemason)
Trilateral Commission has as mentioned above declared the task from
1973 here in the forth and last phase to gather the world in three
non-democratic blocks:
The America Continents
(via NAFTA), Europe, Africa and
Russia (via EU) and Asia (under Japan). The condition for this is that it will
succeed to remove the sovereignty an the identity of the obstinated human
beings. This happens for example by giving a lot of cultural alien peoples free
access to settle down and live permanently in the states of Europe.
In this way Europe shall
first begin to look like USA that many Europeans in their unrealistic dreams
created by the media succumb to flat on their face. In reality we deal with an
America that also is coming to an end. The reason for this is multietnicity,
criminality, and super-national indebtedness, of about $18,000 trillions
(1995).[15]
EU should not be too strong with a bankruct Russia if drifted away from US and
NATO. So we get the immigrants from the Middle East, South Asia and Africa.
The American people or the voters are the responsible
for this just as little as the Europeans are for the indebtedness of, and the
immigration to the nations
of Europe of about 20 million muslims in a period of less than 20 years. Who
decides?
Two tactics or perhaps two strategies are
matching
The
Islamic World is parallel with this trying to realize the dream about a halal (or
Islamics clean) world. It happens by starting migration, and at the same time
finance the Western nations, especially the European Union by loans via the
Club of Paris and Arabic own banks, for example Bank of
Credit and Commerce International, till now in competition with the traditional
international banks. First of these Western nations to be taken are the most
opened and most vulnerable to the Islamic migration from the over-crowded,
therefore pure, and therefore extremely unstable areas in the Middle East, South
Asia and Africa. The Islamic leaders of the U-countries also enjoy the Islamic
Foundation of Development[16].
The migration from islamic enclave on the Balkans are the last shot across the
bows and from the summer 1996 Kosovo-Albanians, from the former Soviet Union
and continuous big crowds from Africa.[17]
Now we wait for more war
in Macedonia, where the international power has already had added fuel to the
flames.
The objects for the
Western-dominated the most influential circle of persons of the international
of association, and the objects for the islamic leaders are perhaps not the
same in the long run however. For a while the means and some of the objects in
both plans fit each other fine. This is being used by both parts. We are
foreseen to be their slaves. This is a fight about power that have been fought
since the year 711.
The income from the oil
increased dramatically quick two time in the seventies. This and our weak,
therefore powerhungry, therefore debtseeking professional politicians have only
poured the extra needed petrol into the fire so that the master race could push
itself forward[18].
None of the states in
Europe are able to stop the madness by traditional political decisions, because
all of the them (except for Norway, Luxembourg, and Switzerland) are net
indebted up to the ears of their citizens, of their children and of their
grandchildren.
There are
nobody else to pay. The German national debt was about DM 2½ (Amr.) trillion(1995), of
which only DM ½ trillion or 500 (Amr.) billions (1995) was caused by the
Reunion of Germany or the fall of DDR, and the fall of the Soviet Union.
National
indebtedness year after year secures weak, power-hungry politicians 'in visible
power' for a longer time, when the constitutions do not prevent this
effectively. Naturally it is the seeming power of our political leaders, for
they are pure marionettes in the international game. Some of our best known
politicians are completely conscious of these things, because they are members
of two of the mentioned masonry-like organizations.
They will not learn from
history, and we are not allowed to learn from it either. They are rewriting the
history-books of Europe and an EU-dictionary is coming soon, while the debt of
member-states, of EU itself, and the national debt of USA are still rising
wilder every year.
Some of the leaders of
the national-states try in their weak, powerlessness to well-knit the European
Union, but the union is exactly in full accordance with both international
plans. If it had not been, it would however not have been very much of use,
when all the nations are indebted. All the leaders of the member-nations can
indebt the peoples even more together with one single currency in 12 of 15
members-states in 2002. The consequences of Euro are listed partly in the next
section, and a little more completely in the Appendix 2.
Looking at production and
economy the most powerful impacts of globalization is driven by high taxes,
high wages, powerful labor unions and profit-seeking businesses in a technical
and educational most diversified world. The impacts are reflagging of
production, and immigration toward the Western world. If this last development
was more or less planned does not matter, it suited the objectives very
well.
The voluntary ECU frightened too many in Germany without any
reason, the same in United Kingdom and in Denmark, people understood very
little of the facts, and of the money-plans, but many suspected the plots of
course. At first ECU was proposed as non-compulsory currency by the British
former Minister of Foreign Affaires and former Prime Minister John Major[19].
Euro was invented in the office of the
German former Minister of Finance Theo Waigel. This is an example of how
ignorance to changed realities sometimes makes less noise than, if the changes
apparently are much bigger, and they are mentioned and explained a great deal
more. Here the rulers were not cautious enough from the start.
The name of currency
(nearly the only thing we informed about) is of the same real (un)importance as
the colors of the notes. But it is important to create quiet, and keep silence
about the whole thing - they thought. This did not happen with the new, from the
start so-called 'national' EURO. The currency
then had be common like the monetary- and creditpolicy, and in reality the
finance policy in consequence of this too. This arrangement of the monetary
realm leads automatically to a new creation of an artificial EURO-state, Euroland, Neurope[20].
It
is for the individual beneficially and practically important to know a few
things more than is thrown light on here. You are welcome to write to or call
me with these practical questions after you have read Appendix 2 [21].
If they do not get
Denmark, United Kingdom and Sweden (the last two mentioned have postponed the
decision) away from reservation respectively does get to join the
money-arrangements, they might try to expand EU, and form the military
West-Union ready for action more rapidly. They stated the reason for this
unreliably with and trained it practically in the self-created lengthening of
the Balkan Wars.
Debt
(to an unkown creditor):
The
creditors are Islamic OPEC-countries, international wholesaler-banks and the
international high finance[22].
Only the truth is to be
used against puppeteers and the money-power-centers, and the staged
international insanity created from a sick idea[23]
in the mentioned international agencies and masonry-like organizations.
The
time factor and a common fight for the truth are definitively determining, if we
shall win the only thing that we can count on within the democratic way: Win
victory over the internationalists (read: Lenin's & Trotsky’s Useful
Idiots) in our population. They 'reside' in every considerable institution, and
they dominate all the media in Denmark. Many of them is just playing the
winning horse, they hope. From these institutions they lie day out day in to
bring the minds of the receivers into the right outlook. Unfortunately we have
no time left, if the development shall be turned without big troubles, and
perhaps war. Perhaps it is too late. We shall as a result save our 1000 year
old nation.
They
try to manage, to direct and control the individuals, most of time
unconsciously without the individuals know, what is really happening[24],
like in the old Soviet Union and in Hitler-Germany. In our country it must be
the opposite. Only with effective solidarity and forgiveness across all other
meaningless disagreements, we can nip them in the bud.
This assumes that we let
the raw truth be known to those Danes and those friendly foreigners in the same
boat that will save their nation too. A deciding difference between the
situation in Denmark August 29th 1943 and now: Nobody is coming to help us from
outside.
When
the D-Mark, the Franc and the Lire shall be entirely abolished Juli 1st
2002 (a
statement made in 1996)
Currency-sovereignty and independent finance policy
The prerequisite for the dkr. to be
coupled to the EURO is that the Danish government live up to the expectation of
the savings and no deficit on the balance og public finances and other claims
from the ECB - European Central Bank. “It is just cracy to go on with a national
currency-independence, when the EURO has been accepted by our politicians
anyway.” It must mean that the finance policy, the monetary- and
interest-policy in Denmark is being ruled directly as some contra-yield to the
coupling - and even after a NO at the
Danish referendum about the EURO.
What a coupling. September the 13th
2000 the Danish National Bank had to intervene with 3 billions kr. because the
German authorities sold Danish government bonds just as it announced would
happen, if the Danish voted no. Just the poll that showed a clear NO was enough
(the fall 2000).
The Danish politicians talked about
the strong Danish krone throught the summer 2000 (the fall 2000). They aught to
know better, but they do or must not[25].
As long as there are monetary-monopolies - the national central banks have
monopoly of money-issuing - there can not be another monopoly above.
But there actually is.
Claims of convergency - Stability
The claims of convergency gives a hint of the
firmness of rules. For instance in the Maastricht-treaty, article 104C you
read: ’After a general estimation the Counsel... states if there is a
relativily big deficit’. This is certainly not a stringent rule about the
yearly deficit on the public finances that must not be larger than 3% of GDP in
market prices.
It can also be read in the treaty that the
interpretation of these claims is a matter for the Counsel of Ministers. The
claims are generally nearly radom and mostly inconsistent to one another. For
instance the claim of convergency concerning the rate of inflation. It is the
weakest of the claims.
You also read that a country to secure
price-stability must not reach a rate of inflation of more than 1.5 % more than
the average of the rates in the three most price-stable countries in the monetary
union. This tells nothing at all about the real rate of inflation. The
debt-claims are really inconsistent. The amount of deficit on the public
finances - taxes minus the public expenses - which must not amount to more than
3% of GDP (minus the requirements of raw materials) is surely not so important
as the claims about getting the debt of the state down to 60% of GDP. The half
of the countries can not fulfill that last claim without accepting crises of
instability.
Stability is really
not accounted by a index of prices that means some quantitive standards are to
be fulfilled, and we then say the currency in stable. Stability includes the
dynamics of capital-formation, securing the process of investment, economic
growth and high productivity. All this can not be reached or calculated on the
basis of some static conception.
Capital flight - Socialcrisis - Declining of rules
Foreigners as well as domestic people, which do
not trust the new money, will transfer their values to other currencies. The
EMU will begin with a crisis. The capital flight will throw Europe into a
social crisis, because the capital flight will force ECB to raise the common interest rate. The southern European countries
and Belgium, Irland and Denmark - cannot get through this.
When the social crisis is there the temptation
is big to try to manage it with public investments and with a consciously
public increase the amount of money. This means deficit on the public finances,
and then we are back in Keynesianism, where the responsible - in a now 60 years
old era - have followed the line of least resistance to remain in office.
Very soon it will prove that the taken measures
against the inflation as desribed in the Maastricht Treaty will not help very
much. We will then face a lasting crisis thanks to the new currency of unit.
This will break the currency-union.
Inflation - Social crises
The competent individuals of the ECB will
certainly not be unscrupulous inflationists. Through a price-stability oriented
policy they will try to make the new currency truth-worthy. But they are left
with the problem that stability-oriented policy have to be strengthed cause by
the capital flight - and that this policy must meet national resistance, which
will appear because of the sharpened structural and social crises.
It is rather the interest rate and the
expectations of profit than the wage-rate which decide the activity in Europe.
A currency reform, where you state the dates of all the changes, and where you
principally keep the national currency-sovereignty
for three year in an changing phase have to be made by politician without any
real insight at all, and by reality-entrenched technocrates or made by
traitors. When the speculation quite foreseeable is one of the mighty problems
at the establishment, then it is nonsence-project. It was not quite
unforeseeable.
Eventually a stop for capital flight
Article 73F in the Maastricht treaty deals with
an Europe where control with capital movement may be introduced. The investors
can then no longer escape to Swiss franc, yen or dollars. As if the investors
were not enough scared till now. Speculators/investors keep up with this very
carefully all the time.
If they do not get
Denmark - United Kingdom and Sweden postponed the decision of the European
currency - away from it reservation to the currency-arrangements, and Britain
and Sweden also decide not join Euro, they perhaps will try to expand EU and
make the military West-Union ready for action more rapidly. They stated the
reason for this unreliably with and trained it practically in the self-created
lengthe-ning of the Balkans War.
How did the EURO develop the first year?
Currency-unit |
01/25/00 |
01/25/99 |
EURO-rate-develop. p.c. *) |
US dollar |
1.0063 |
1.1603 |
-13.2 |
British £ |
0.6094 |
0.6995 |
-12.8 |
Jap. YEN |
106.3000 |
132.7700 |
-19.9 |
SFR |
1.6111 |
1.5963 |
+0.9 |
Canadian $ |
1.4514 |
1.7670 |
-17.8 |
Australian $ |
1.5376 |
1.8395 |
-16.4 |
Norwegian kr. |
8.0859 |
8.6224 |
-6.2 |
Swedish kr. |
8.9090 |
8.9632 |
-0.6 |
Danish kr. |
7.43?? |
7.4368 |
0.0**) |
*) Accounted in relation to
exchange-rate 01/25/99
**) The Danish crone has been fixed in relation to EURO
Supplement: The
development related to US-dollar until september 15th 2000 is –25%
Another suplement:
EURO-DKK-currency invested in
US$-government-bonds resulted in a yield of 12.3 p.c. p.y. from currency-rate-development
plus 4-6% extra from USD-government-bonds for the last 12 month when you account from 01-07-01. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"That it does not pay
better off to invest in production anybody can understand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Especially when your investment
is very easy transfered to or taken home from a most private location." |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can read further
deatail on : http://www.oanda.com
Example: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
delopment can også be read on www.oanda.com. Let us explain what the figures
show by an example. You may say that if you purse contained 100,000 Danish kr.
both in januar 1999 and 2000, you have lost 6,200 kr in a year, if you compare
with the situation, where you instead changed to Norwegian kr. in Januar 1999
and change back in january 2000. The exchange-cost (in Denmark 25-30 dkr. a
time excluded oligopoly-high bankprofit on the exchangerate) excluded.
If you had
compared the sum in US-dollars instead of dkr or EURO you would have earned
13.2 % in a year without doing anything else.
These things are not told clearly by Danish
media. They repoted at the beginning of 2000 that you should invest in the
stock market. Bluff ! They try to get the losses from the stock market
distributed to you too, if the collaps of the stock markets should come.
Somebody
has discovered the currency exchange-rates to be a little lower than shown
here. The profits of the banks are never included in the presentations, I have to
report.
They told
us about lower exchange-payments with the Euro.This payments has increased
instead. Mars 10th 1999 German ARD-TVs Tageschau showed that the exchange-cost
has increased all over Germa-ny too. The decrease of the Euro means that the
capital leaves Europe. They are talking about the competition-favor in the
trade from a lower Euro.
The
other half of the problem is the problem as things are.
We told it
in advance not because we were paid to do so, but because we knew it. In order
to most invest have to borrow (the shortest version to explain). With an
decreasing Euro the interest-rate have to be increased, but among many other
things without the foreign capital we cannot produce the products we might
sell. In the beginning of 2000 the interest rates were being increased in both
Europe and USA, and the result is that the capital will then return to USA. If
the ECB later on must intervene the market it have to borrow the capital that
left Europe.
Lower
taxes and lower wages were never on their minds.
The rest of
the development, and the lost knowledge from 2000 and forward I shall try to
give you in chapter 6.
[1] After
one generation everybody, who has not been told in secrecy, must seek his knowledge
in writings. Writings have to be published in order to have any extension at
all.
[2] It is
not cheap to become elected President of U.S.A. after C.F.R. and
Federal Reserve System have
taken over “the interior” opinion of who is the best in this position.
[3] Henry
Morgenthau Junior
was appointed to Minister of Finance (Secreatary of Treasury). Harry Dexter
White was
second in charge. Morgenthau expresses his opinion about the peace, and his
view of Germany very precisely in the book that was published after World War II in 1945. Harry Dexter White has
written the book that Morgenthau signed, Charles Higham tells in his book
'Trading with the enemy' from 1983. As far as I know nobody has found anything
to correct in this book that primery was send to top.
Read a few extracts on : http://www.lilliput-information.com/engbis.html
From 'Germany Is Our Problem' (Signed by Morgenthau,
written by White):
"The Treaty of Versailles
and its conditions were as mild as they could be. The theory that the German
people would appreciate milder conditions, was advocated by most of the leading
personalities on the Peace Conference in
Paris".
"Germany's way towards the
peace is through agriculture. The German working men and women can serve
themselves and the world best by cultivating the German soil".
"Germany without heavy
industry has the laborforce and the arable land enough to feed itself. It would
mean troubles and hard work for many years. But that will be the fact, if
either Germany is allowed to build heavy industry or not".
"..when Great Britain's most
considerable political question was the Parliament Reform, which was agreed in
1832, the Germans were occupied by studying Hegel. This pioneer in the German philosophy taught
that the state was God's most complete expression in human life, that the
Prussian were the most noble expression of this heavenly authority, and that
this existence was the culmination of the historical development."
"..for one hundred years the
Germans have prefered Hegel for
Heine (mine: Heinrich Heine who inspired the top of the French Socialists). He
who try to understand both of them, will find that the tast of the Germans is a
little too mysterical for other people..".
"The reason is not that the
Germans are not brought up, but that they on purpose and efficiently were
brought up wrong. That middle aged faith that war is the only worthy occupation
for a real man, and the best business for an ordinary human being, was livivng
on in Germany, long time after it had been antiquated in that Europe, which was
considered civilized... Other peoples have naturally had their outburst of
megalomania".
Theodor N. Kaufman published in
1941 the book: 'Germany Must Perish'.
The title speakes for itself.
My comments to the few of Henry Morgenthaus'
considerations that were included above: The Sovjet Union would or should have
got the wanted or not wanted territorial dominans on the continent with the
order taught by Morgenthau in the publication mentioned above. Supplementary it
must be mentioned that the experimenthal-psycologist Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt, who
was a child like Hegel of the same German/ European epoch in the
18th and the 19th century, exported his illuminated worship of the human being
with an enormous succes to U.S.A. from Leipzig already in the first quarter of
the 20th century. As we shall see below this individual-destroying cult
conquered the American Education System before Worldwar II.
From U.S.A. this bestial worshipping of the
human being returned to Europe, also to Germany, but not before the Postwar
Period (after ww2) it conquered the
schools and the sector of education in Europe. Later on and to day (2002), it
goes on and on within EU and UN’s UNESCO, especially in France (read more below).
[4] Professor
Birck, who presumably preferred the gold, wrote on page 27 in his book, 'The media of
Exchan-ge of the Economy of Credit' in the year 1900:
"State
the reason for the comparative rarity of the gold it will
be easy for a few rich firms, as Bleichroeder, Rothschild frères,
the Goulds ect. to make a corner in gold; by drawing some few millions (in
1900) in gold from one leading bank they could, because the means of credit is
reduced corresponding to that, create artificial scarcity of money that will
mean a high interest and a depression in the market of shares. It is well known
that scarcity of money effects the industrial papers more than the government
papers, and again it effects most stongly on the courses of the most
questionable shares. The French anti-Semites claim that the Rothschilds often
use (mine: written in the year 1900) these tactics, when they speculate en baisse."
[5] On
page 146 in 'The Economic Consequences of
the Peace' from November 1919.
[6] On
page 149 in the same book Keynes wrote:
"In the later stages of the
war all the belligerent governments practiced, from necessity or incompetence,
what a Bolshevist might have done from the design" (unquote).
The lack of explanation to inflation
throughout all the voluminous writings of Keynes may be found on this
necessity. Incompetence too? We can not know. He could have told us.
A source to possible exploitation:
J. M. Keynes was a homosexual, the approved
Anthony Sampson wrote in: “The Hidden Power”.
WINSTON
CHURCHILL like John Maynard Keynes wrote the totally opposite before and after
he was picked up by the top.
1.Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill's article "Zionism Versus Bolsjevism" that was
published February 8th 1920 in Illustrated Sunday Herald, tells that Trotzky
belonged to the same Jewish plot as the one that began with Adam
Weishaupt"...and Illuminati of 1776.
2. Winston Churchill
The freemason Winston Churchill emphasized that if USA had not entered WWI,
peace would had been made between England and Germany, og then the Russian Tzar
had not been removed. In that case the Bolsheviks would not had succeded with
taken the power in Russia (Social Justice Magazine, nr. 3, Juli 1st 1939, p)
It should not be so.
2. Winston Churchill
"The one who cannot see that on Earth a big endeavour is taking place, an
important plan, on which realiza-tion we are allowed to collaborate as faithful
servants, certainly has to be blind" - Winston Churchill - (33 Degree Freemason)
A lot of other participants in the 'big endeavour' have been quoted on:
http://www.lilliput-information.com/nwo.html
[7] Last
time used as a so-called peace-mediator in the dear conflict-solving model of
UN and EU in Ex-Jugoslavia. Were there not 13 of this kind in Bosnia before the
world-army call US “had to” go in.
[8] The
one we know from the Danish, the German, the American Labor Market Policy in the latest
15 years.
[9] Former
adviser of Security-Politics for President Jimmy Carter, and mentioned by
Senator Barry Goldwater Jimmy Carter was found by Z. B. and David Rockefeller.
[10] To
signal is a widespreading phenomenon under 'Danish Media-Cracy'. It means to
send information to the right receiver (eventually a group) without any
unauthorized interference, that means without noise on the transmission.
Earlier the meaning of signals e.g.
was close connected to railways and other trafic.
[11] The
reader could find the books.
[12] Read
for example Cohen's book with the subtitle 'A Racial Program For The Twentieth
Century'. It is a directly written program of how to encourage the communism by
beating with racism against the people till they loose their selfrespect, and then
much easier are being managed.
[13] But it
is not very difficult to ascertain the results of the work in the group, when a
few pieces of the plan come into the hands of outsiders.
[14] Read
about this for example in Jean Monnet's: Memoirs, Collins, London, 1978.
[15] Billions
(in Europe) are still called trillions in U.S.A. In English $18 billions are
$18,000 milliards or $18,000,000,000,000 that is in American $ 18 trillions.
[16] For
example the hidden, but found again European-Arabic Dialog speakes
distinctly about 'the united plans' for the Arabic countries and EU. The
Euro-Arabic Conference in Barcelona November 27th to 28th 1995 followed these
efforts up with more concrete decisions (compare: The Department of Foreign
Affaires in Denmark, case Journal No 400. E.6-14).
The Law for Foreigners and all
the laws following this in Denmark from 1983 (read more below) have been
written in the light of these secret international agreements. It would not had
been necessary.
I am sure the people of Denmark would have backed the
politicians, if they had done, what the people wanted them to do. Apparently
they decided in the interest of others. In Austria they can with the new
government from February 2000 get a referendum if 10 p.c. of the voter want it.
One of reason why EU made sanctions against this countries.
In Switzerland it is the same, and Bayern, Germany
gives a referendum if 20 p.c. of the voters want it. That is the way we perhaps
might go.
The
problem/the crime is then: They were selected by the people/the voters of
Denmark, but these visible rulers told lies most of time, and did that they
were told to do by the real rulers.
[17] Several
well-informed and well-founded sourcers say that Denmark is a experimentation-nation
for the leaders of the New World Order. Denmark was selected because of its clarity
and the temper of the Danes.
[18] In
this connection it must be mentioned that Keynes in the thirties foresaw a
quick industrialization of the Afro-Asiatic area in the Postwar Period would
lead to big general increases in prices on raw-materials. Generally it developed directly opposite.
[19] The
ECU was a
voluntary European currency side by side of the other real national currencies. It could gradually be included freely in
the trading, and in the exchanging activities. If you mistrusted your own
currency or your Minister of Finance, you could choose the ECU instead of your
national currency. Then the ECU-emission-house (that had to be established) had
to buy Danish Krones with the result that the amount of Dansh Krones had to be
decreased. Your Minister of Finance then had to raise the interest rate. This would have been his punishment made by
you alone. And the sovereignty of your national centralbank was then
untouched. A very fine English proposal, indeed, made by John Major under
Margaret Thathers – when you for a moment forget the problem of nominal and
real rates of exchange that will be explained later on. The EURO is
fateful, because the single nation with this no longer has any monetary
sovereignty, and because the states of Europe with extremely different natural,
economic, financial, cultural structures cannot have the same monetary policy
without unstability in a period, where the foreign capital is leaving for USA.
The EURO is forced upon us, and it is a united currency that the citizens, the
businesses, the European Central Bank (ECB) in Frankfurt, the politicians, and
the speculators have to legitimate at the same time. EURO is a catastrophe,
because it is a pure illusion, I promise! Read the next section, and I presume
you will understand, too. Read also Appendix 2 about e.g. ‘Euro, the end of the
social state’.
[20] "...the
Europe that is shaping now is temporary the Europe of the banks, its heros are
Roth-schilds and Rockefellers, and a entire new hagiographi has grown up to
fête them", Anthony Sampson wrote in 1968 in ”The New Europeans”.
Hodder & Stoughton. England 1968.
[21] My
name and the address is:
cand.
oecon. Joern E. Vig - Stadion Allé 48 - DK-8000 Aarhus C - Danmark - Tel. or Fax
(+45) 86 14 58 37, e-mail: eviginfo@aarhus.mail.telia.com
Wedsite: www.lilliput-information.com
[22] Anthony
Rothschild wrote in
1866: "We want peace at any price. What are Germany, Austria or Belgium to
us. Those sort of things is antiquated".
[23] A sick
idea I have to call it, as it includes changes that fight the course of nature
or other parts of simple truth.
[24] Read
note 1 in chapter 7.
[25] There certainly is a difference between statesmen and professional
politicians of today.